課程資訊
課程名稱
性別與環境
Gender and Environment 
開課學期
107-2 
授課對象
工學院  建築與城鄉研究所  
授課教師
畢恆達 
課號
BP7041 
課程識別碼
544 M3090 
班次
 
學分
3.0 
全/半年
半年 
必/選修
選修 
上課時間
星期二2,3,4(9:10~12:10) 
上課地點
工綜313 
備註
限碩士班以上
總人數上限:30人
外系人數限制:8人 
Ceiba 課程網頁
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1072BP7041_ 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

一、課 名:性別與環境(107 學年度下學期)
二、課程編號:544 M3090
三、學 分 數:3
四、授課老師:畢恆達 e-mail: hdbih@ntu.edu.tw
五、上課時間及地點:每週二第234節,工313室
六、課程概要:
本課程的目的在於藉著閱讀、研討、觀察與經驗研究,加強對於社會現象中性別與空間議題的敏感程度與分析能力。課程內容除了討論性別與空間的基礎理論與概念之外,也希望涵蓋台灣的性別空間現象,以及實際的政策評估。
主要參考書目:畢恆達(2004)《空間就是性別》。台北:心靈工坊。
Gender & Geography Bibliography http://gpow.org/gendergeog/
畢恆達(編)(2019)《性別與空間參考書目》。

2/19 課程簡介
2/26 臺大校園的空間性別史,看看前人種樹,想想我們還可以做什麼?
台大/校園性別空間運動史(從宿舍門禁、女研社/GayChat/Lamda、A片事件、同志曝光事件、女廁運動、游泳池鵑的卡、女性優先籃球場,到性別友善宿舍)

3/05如何做性別?性別運動的策略,去性別,還是積極行動?
West, C. & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1(2), 125-151.
Lorber, J. (2000). Using gender to undo gender: A feminist degendering movement. Feminist Theory, 1(1), 79-95.
Deutsch, F. M. (2007). Undoing Gender. Gender & Society, 21(1), 106-127.
Connell, C. (2010). Doing, undoing, or redoing gender? Learning from the workplace experiences of transpeople. Gender and Society, 24(1), 31-55.
Walby, S. (2005). Gender mainstreaming: Productive tensions in theory and practice. Social Politics, 12(3), 321-343.
Damyanovic, D. (2013). Gender mainstreaming as a strategy for sustainable urban planning. In I. S. de Madariag & M. Roberts (Eds.), Fair shared cities: The impact of gender planning in Europe (pp. 177-192). Surrey: Ashgate.

3/12 性別與空間,還是性別化的空間?
Roberts, M. (2013). Introduction: Concepts, themes and issues in a gendered approach to planning. In I. S. de Madariag & M. Roberts (Eds.), Fair shared cities: The impact of gender planning in Europe (pp. 1-18). Surrey: Ashgate.
Tummers, L. (2013). Gendered perspectives on spatial planning and housing in the Netherlands. In I. S. de Madariag & M. Roberts (Eds.), Fair shared cities: The impact of gender planning in Europe (pp. 107-129). Surrey: Ashgate.
Irschik, E., & Kail, E. (2013). Vienna: Progress towards a fair shared city. In I. S. de Madariag & M. Roberts (Eds.), Fair shared cities: The impact of gender planning in Europe (pp. 193-229). Surrey: Ashgate.
Ullmann, F. (2013). Choreography of life: Two pilot projects of social housing in Vienna. In I. S. de Madariag & M. Roberts (Eds.), Fair shared cities: The impact of gender planning in Europe (pp. 297-323). Surrey: Ashgate.
Weisman, L. K. (1992). Discrimination by design: A feminist critique of the man-made environment. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.(《設計的性別歧視:「男造」環境的女性主義批評》(王志弘等譯)。台北:巨流)
Franck, K. A. (2002). Women and environment. In R. B. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 347-362). New York: Wiley.
Bondi, L., & Davidson, J. (2004). Situating gender. In L. Nelson & J. Seager (Eds.), A companion to feminist geography (pp. 15-31). London: Blackwell.
Paravicini, U. (2003). Public spaces as a contribution to egalitarian cities. In U. Terlinden (Ed.), City and gender: International discourse on gender, urbanism and architecture (pp. 57-80). Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
Wekerle, G. R. (2005). Gender and the city: Urban restructuring, social exclusion, and gender claims. In H. H. Hiller (Ed.), Urban Canada: Sociological perspectives (pp. 224-244). New York: Oxford University Press.
孫瑞穗(2005)〈女性主義的空間再思:從女性主義理論化中的性別/空間政治談起〉。畢恆達(編)《性別與空間之教學、研究與政策十年回顧與前瞻》(頁1-12)。台北:性別與空間研究室。
畢恆達(2005)〈性別化都市空間:從性別觀點檢是十年來的公共空間政策〉。畢恆達(編)《性別與空間之教學、研究與政策十年回顧與前瞻》(頁13-42)。台北:性別與空間研究室。
張華蓀(2005)〈蝸行20年:女性主義地理學在臺灣的發展〉。《地理學報》,42,25-46。

3/19 男女身體有別?像女孩那樣丟球?如果男生玩阿魯巴,那女生玩什麼?
(紀錄片:身體政治)
Wex, M. (1979). Let's take back our space: "Female" and "male" body language as a result of patriarchal structures. Berlin: Frauenliteraturverlag Hermine Fees.
Young, I. M. (2005). On female body experience: "Throwing like a girl" and other essays. New York: Oxford University Press. (中譯本:《像女孩那樣丟球:論女性身體經驗》)
Thorne, B., & Luria, Z. (1986). Sexuality and gender in children's daily worlds. Social Problems, 33(3), 176-190.
Karsten, L. (2003). Children's use of public space: The gendered world of the playground. Childhood: A Global Journal of Child Research, 10(4), 457-473.
Longhurst, R. (2005). Fat bodies: Developing geographical research agendas. Progress in Human Geography, 29(3), 247-259.
Owen, L. (2012). Living fat in a thin-centric world: Effects of spatial discrimination on fat bodies and selves. Feminism & Psychology, 22(3), 290-306.

3/26 體育是男人最後的堡壘?男女要合賽,還是分賽競技?
(紀錄片:Playing Unfair)
Hargreaves, J. (1994). Sports feminism: The importance of gender. In Sporting females: Critical issues in the history and sociology of women’s sports (pp. 25-41). New York: Routledge.
Larsson, H. (2014). Can gender equality become an encumbrance? : The case of sport in the Nordic countries. In J. Hargreaves & E. Anderson (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sport, gender and sexuality (pp. 226-234). New York: Routledge.
Drury, S. (2014). Gay sports spaces: Transgressing hetero(/homo)normativity and transforming sport? In J. Hargreaves & E. Anderson (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sport, gender and sexuality (pp. 309-317). New York: Routledge.
McDonagh, E., & Pappano, L. (2008). What’s the problem?; The sex difference question; Title IX: Old norms in new forms; Pass the ball. In Playing with the boys: Why separate is not equal in sports (pp. 1-38; 39-76; 77-112; 225-260). New York: Oxford University Press.(讀第1, 2, 3, 7章)
Wellard, I. (2009). Sport and Masculinities. Bodies and Masculinities In Sport, masculinities and the body (pp. 10-24; 25-41). New York: Routledge. (台大圖書館有電子檔)
Pronger, B. (2000). Homosexuality and sport: Who's winning? In J. Mckay, M. A. Messner & D. J. Sabo (Eds.), Masculinities, gender relations and sport (pp. 222-244). London: Sage.

4/02 溫書假
4/09 家是安全的堡壘嗎?還是你要逃離的地方?
Valentine, G. (2001). The home. In Social geographies: Space & society (pp. 63-103). Harlow, England: Prentice Hall.
Gorman-Murray, A. (2008). Masculinity and the Home: A critical review and conceptual framework. Australian geographer, 39(3), 367-379.
Choi, Y. (2013). The Meaning of Home for Transgendered People. In Y. Taylor & M. Addison (Eds.), Queer presences and absences (pp. 118-140). Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Casey, M. (2013). Belonging: Lesbians and gay men’s claims to material spaces. In Y. Taylor & M. Addison (Eds.), Queer presences and absences (pp. 141-158). Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cooper Marcus, C.(2000)〈結為伴侶:共創家園時的權力鬥爭。生活與工作:家中的領土、控制與隱私〉。《家屋,自我的一面鏡子》(頁185-258)。臺北:張老師文化。
Meah, A. (2014). Reconceptualising ‘masculinity’ through men’s contributions to domestic foodwork. In A. Gorman-Murray & P. Hopkins (Eds.), Masculinities and place (pp. 191-208). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
畢恆達(1996)〈已婚婦女的住宅空間體驗〉。《本土心理學研究》,6,300-352。

4/16 恐懼地景或安全的城市?
(記錄片:War Zone)
Preston, V., & Ustundag, E. (2005). Feminist geographies of the “city”: Multiple voices, multiple meanings. In L. Nelson & J. Seager (Eds.), A companion to feminist geography (pp. 211-227). London: Blackwell.
Koskela, H. (2005). Urban space in plural: Elastic, tamed, suppressed. In L. Nelson & J. Seager (Eds.), A companion to feminist geography (pp. 257-270). London: Blackwell.
Hubbard, P. (2005). Women outdoors: Destabilizing the public/private dichotomy. In L. Nelson & J. Seager (Eds.), A companion to feminist geography (pp. 322-333). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Dymén, C., & Ceccato, V. (2012). An international perspective of the gender dimension in planning for urban safety. In V. Ceccato (Ed.), The urban fabric of crime and fear (pp. 311-339). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Whitzman, C. (2007). Stuck at the front door: Gender, fear of crime and the challenge of creating safer space. Environment and Planning A, 39(11), 2715-2732.
Koskela, H. (1997). "Bold walk and breakings": Women's spatial confidence versus fear of violence. Gender, Place and Culture, 4(3), 301-319.
Quinn, B. A. (2002). Sexual harassment and masculinity: The power and meaning of "girl watching". Gender and Society, 16(3), 386-402.
Beebeejaun, Y. (2009). Making safer places: Gender and the right to the city. Security Journal, 22(3), 219 – 229.
Wekerle, G., & Whitzman, C. (1995). Safe cities: Guidelines for planning, design, and management. Ontario: Nelson.
畢恆達(2008)《無性別偏見的校園空間設計準則手冊》。台北:教育部。

4/23 都市與性產業
Kelly, E. D., & Cooper, C. B. (2015). From perception to reality: Negative secondary effects and effective regulation of sex businesses in the United States. In P. J. Maginn & C. Steinmetz (Eds.), (Sub)Urban sexscapes: Geographies and regulation of the sex industry (pp. 241-260). New York: Routledge.
Papayanis, M. A. (2000). Sex and the revanchist city: Zoning out pornography in New York. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18(3), 341-353.
Prior, J. (2008). Planning for Sex in the City: Urban governance, planning and the placement of sex industry premises in inner Sydney. Australian geographer, 39(3), 339-352.
Hubbard, P. (2015). Law, sex and the city: Regulating sexual entertainment venues in England and Wales. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 7(1), 5-20.

4/30 性別友善?無性別?還是其他廁所?
Browne, K. (2004). Genderism and the bathroom problem: (Re)materializing sexed sites, (re)creating sexed bodies. Gender, Place, and Culture, 11(3), 331-346.
Overall, C. (2007). Public toilets: Sex segregation revisited. Ethics & Environment, 12(2), 71-91.
Kogan, T. S. (1996). Transsexuals and critical gender theory: The possibility of a restroom labeled ‘Other’. Hastings Law Journal, 48, 1223-55.
Kogan, T. S. (2007). Sex-separation in public restrooms: Law, architecture, and gender. Michigan Journal of Gender and Law, 14(1), 1-57.
Jeffreys, S. (2014). The politics of the toilet: A feminist response to the campaign to 'degender' a women's space. Women's Studies International Forum, 45, 42-51.
Ingrey, J. C. (2012). The public school washroom as analytic space for troubling gender: Investigating the spatiality of gender through students' self-knowledge. Gender & Education, 24(7), 799-817. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2012.721537
Cavanagh, S. L. (2010). Queering bathrooms: Gender, sexuality, and the hygienic imagination. Buffalo: University of Toronto Press.
彭渰雯(2005)〈從女廁運動到無性別廁所:一個參與者的反省〉。畢恆達等(編)《性別與空間之教學、研究與政策十年回顧與前瞻》(頁68-81)。臺北:臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所幸別與空間研究室。
Bathrooms for everyone http://safe2pee.org

5/07 是異性戀空間,還是同性戀空間?
Valentine, G. (1996). (Re)negotiating the 'heterosexual street'. In N. Duncan (Ed.), Bodyspace: Destabilizing geographies of gender and sexuality (pp. 146-155). New York: Routledge.
Formby, E. (2017). Exploring LGBT spaces and communities: Contrasting identities, belongings and wellbeing. New York: Routledge. (書中的章節The pleasures and pains of scene space. Pride spaces, rituals and symbols.)
賴正哲(2005)《去公司上班:新公園男同志的情慾空間》。臺北:女書。

5/14 跨性別空間體驗
Choi, Y. (n.d.). Endangered gender: Gendered surveillance in transgender people’s everyday spaces. Unpublished manuscript.
Doan, P. L. (2007). Queers in the American city: Transgendered perceptions of urban space. Gender, Place & Culture, 14(1), 57-74.
Doan, P. L. (2010). The tyranny of gendered spaces: Reflections from beyond the gender dichotomy. Gender, Place & Culture, 17(5), 635-654.
Felsenthal, K. D. (2004). Socio-spatial experiences of transgender individuals. In J. L. Chin (Ed.), The psychology of prejudice and discrimination: Bias based on gender and sexual orientation (pp. 201-225). Westport, CT: Praeger.

5/21 街頭塗鴉與性別
Macdonald, N. (2001). Constructive destruction: Graffiti as a tool for making masculinity. In The graffiti subculture: Youth, masculinity and identity in London and New York (pp. 94-150). New York: Palgrave.
Pabón-Colón, J. N. (2018). Graffiti grrlz: Performing feminism in the Hip Hop diaspora. New York: New York University Press.

5/28 空間專業教育與性別(紀錄片:打破成規)
Anthony, K. H. (2016). Gender issues in architecture. In M. Kanaani & D. Kopec (Eds.), The Routledge companion for architecture design and practice (pp. 533-548). New York: Routledge.
Stratigakos, D. (2016). Where Are the Women Architects? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Brown, J. B., Harriss, H., Morrow, R., & Soane, J. (Eds.). (2016). A gendered profession: The question of representation in space making. London: RIBA.
Brown, D. S. (1989). Room at the top? Sexism and the star system in architecture. In E. P. Berkeley (Ed.), Architecture: A place for women (pp. 237-246). Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Anonymous (1980). No academic matter: Unconscious discrimination in environmental design education. In G. R. Wekerle, R. Peterson, & D. Morley (Eds.). New space for women (pp. 235-253). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Franck, K. A. (1989). A feminist approach to architecture: Acknowledging women’s ways of knowing. In E. P. Berkeley (Ed.), Architecture: A place for women (pp. 201-216). Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Sang, K. J. C., Dainty, A. R. J., & Ison, S. G. (2014). Gender in the UK architectural profession: (Re)producing and challenging hegemonic masculinity. Work, Employment and Society, 28(2), 247-264.
Faulkner, W. (2007). ‘Nuts and bolts and people’: Gender-troubled Engineering Identities. Social Studies of Science, 37(3), 331-356.
Kullack, T. (2011). Architecture: A woman's profession. Berlin: Jovis Verlag.
Fowler, B. & Wilson, F. M. (2012). Women architects and their discontents. Architectural Theory Review, 17(2-3), 199-215. DOI: 10.1080/13264826.2012.744149
Adams, A., & Tancred, P. (2000). 'Designing women': Gender and the architectural profession. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Anthony, k. H. (2001). Designing for diversity: Gender, race, and ethnicity in the architectural profession. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
殷寶寧(2015)《性別與設計:建築與女性主義的邂逅》。臺北:典藏藝術家庭。
MacLaughlin, N.(2016)《技藝中的生活練習:一個木工學徒的修業之旅》。台北:行路。
Gabor, A.(1997)《愛因斯坦的太太:百年來女性的挫敗與建樹》。台北:智庫文化。(第5章:丹妮思,頁215-314)

6/04 台灣女性建築師學會
6/11 期末報告
6/18 期末報告

 

課程目標
待補 
課程要求
待補 
預期每週課後學習時數
 
Office Hours
 
指定閱讀
待補 
參考書目
待補 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
   
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題
第1週
2/19  課程簡介 
第2週
2/26  臺大性別史 
第3週
3/05  如何做性別 
第4週
3/12  性別化空間 
第5週
3/19  身體與遊戲 
第6週
3/26  體育 
第7週
4/02  溫書假 
第8週
4/09  家與性別 
第9週
4/16  城市公共空間 
第10週
4/23  都市性產業 
第11週
4/30  廁所 
第12週
5/07  同性戀空間 
第13週
5/14  跨性別空間 
第14週
5/21  街頭塗鴉與性別 
第15週
5/28  空間專業教育